Photography in Sabah

https://www.reddit.com/r/Huawei/comments/914mch/taken_with_the_p20_pro_in_pro_mode_40mp_raw_then/

I shall stick with my Lumia 1020 https://pocketnow.com/huawei-p20-pro-photographers-guide A Photographer’s Guide to the Huawei P20 Pro AddThis Sharing Buttons Share to Flipboard Share to Facebook Share to Twitter Share to Reddit Share to Google+ by  Adam Z. Lein June 19, 2018 4:03 am Since 2013, I’ve been using the Nokia Lumia 1020 as my go-to phone for just about everything and especially those days when I know there will be scenic photos to take or especially low-light photos or anything else where I know I’ll want really high resolution flexible RAW photos. I’ve been waiting for a new phone to come out that could compare with its sheer image quality prowess. Finally I think the Huawei P20 Pro with its 40 megapixel camera (plus 3 other cameras) has the flexibility and quality to take the Lumia 1020’s crown. The P20 Pro is much different though and there are lots of tricks to learn and things to avoid in order to make the most out of ...

https://www.fredericpaulussen.be/how-to-make-raw-photos-with-the-huawei-mate-20-pro/ How to make RAW photos with the Huawei Mate 20 Pro Oct 22 Frederic Paulussen Share the post "How to make RAW photos with the Huawei Mate 20 Pro" With new devices come new features. And also new settings. In this blog post, I like to run you through the camera-app of the Huawei Mate 20 Pro to make sure you can photograph in RAW too. Still thinking about buying a Huawei Mate 20 Pro? Read my full review here . Do all three Mate 20 Pro lenses support RAW? The simple and short answer is yes. The longer answer is yes but in different resolutions. The main lens supports 40 megapixels, the telephoto supports 8 megapixels and the ultra-wide supports 20 megapixels. The file-sizes and resolutions are all dependant on which sensor you shoot with. Of course, the 40 megapixels lens will crea...

http://img15.hostingpics.net/pics/714472ISO12233reschart.jpg From the forum: https://www.dpreview.com/forums/post/54175265 This one is slightly less sharp but cropped.

The best camera phones should be tested in the best conditions to determine their best performance. Not to test them in low light conditions where pictures are not going to be good. What is the point of capturing our memories that are blurred any way. Keep them blurred lah. What is important is to keep wonderful views at the highest details, i.e. resolution. That is why I am disappointed by Xperi XZ Premium which drops its resolution to 19Mpixel and yet cannot beat Samsung Galaxy S8+ in low light conditions. Almost as good as the Z5 and XA1 ultra. I will skip XZ Premium. Will buy the lower spec but impressive selfie, XA1 Ultra.

Review, Tested: Kelda 8mm f/3.5 Fisheye Lens for Nikon Posted on March 12, 2015 by lui_gough Fisheye lenses are pretty special when it comes to lenses. Their extreme distortion effect serves to be a novelty, which is sometimes overused , and can prove to be a handy feature to squeeze in extreme fields of view, or to ease 360-degree panorama photo-taking. The number of fisheye options for DSLRs have generally be limited, and it was hard for many to justify spending real money on a real fisheye lens. In terms of options, the one I like most is the Samyang 8mm f/3.5 fisheye (~AU$380), available under a range of different rebadge names such as Bower, Pro-Optic, Rokinon, Opteka, Vivitar, Falcon, Polar, Walimex and Bell and Howwell. In fact, I liked it so much that I owned one for Canon and one for Nikon! The other that’s widely known is a Zenitar 16mm f/2.8 fisheye (~AU$260), which is more suited for full-frame users, and isn’t as nice when it comes to flare handling. T...