Excellent comment on the need for 240 Mpixel cameras.

Excellent comment on the need for 240 Mpixel cameras.
So 106Mpixel is not enough.
Actually 240Mpixel is just enough at 200 dpi.
We need at least 300 dpi to print useable wall photos, which means we need more than 360 Mpixel.
The comment on the need for high megapixel is very sound. We must preserve our memories.
We would regret it taking them at low Mpixel some days.
I still remember the days when I thought 2 Mpixel was good enough. They are now unuseable.
Imagine what will happen to the 8Mpixel which are useable on PC monitors only.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

the best review of Sony A7r II

Image
Review: The a7R II is the Best Camera Sony Has Ever Made Home » EDITORIAL » Review: The a7R II is the Best Camera Sony Has Ever Made Posted By Jaron Schneider on Aug 18, 2015 | 16 Comments It’s been a long, interesting, often frustrating and ultimately an incredibly rewarding journey watching Sony go from fledgling camera maker to likely the most feared manufacturer today. They have come a really long way, and what at first seemed like strange decisions have culminated now into an incredibly well-conceived long term plan. As disappointed as I was in the Sony a7R, the a7S gave me hope that there was much to love about their future. Now, the Sony a7R II is that future, and it’s a brilliant camera that, though not without its flaws, is easily the best overall camera Sony has ever produ   The Sony a7R II is built extremely well, and feels great in hand. If you have held the a7 II, you already know what I mean. The grip isn’t the absolute best on the market...
Read more

Kelda vs Samyang 8mm f3.5 fisheye lenses

Image
Review, Tested: Kelda 8mm f/3.5 Fisheye Lens for Nikon Posted on March 12, 2015 by lui_gough Fisheye lenses are pretty special when it comes to lenses. Their extreme distortion effect serves to be a novelty, which is sometimes overused , and can prove to be a handy feature to squeeze in extreme fields of view, or to ease 360-degree panorama photo-taking. The number of fisheye options for DSLRs have generally be limited, and it was hard for many to justify spending real money on a real fisheye lens. In terms of options, the one I like most is the Samyang 8mm f/3.5 fisheye (~AU$380), available under a range of different rebadge names such as Bower, Pro-Optic, Rokinon, Opteka, Vivitar, Falcon, Polar, Walimex and Bell and Howwell. In fact, I liked it so much that I owned one for Canon and one for Nikon! The other that’s widely known is a Zenitar 16mm f/2.8 fisheye (~AU$260), which is more suited for full-frame users, and isn’t as nice when it comes to flare handling. T...
Read more

How to make RAW photos with the Huawei Mate 20 Pro

Image
https://www.fredericpaulussen.be/how-to-make-raw-photos-with-the-huawei-mate-20-pro/ How to make RAW photos with the Huawei Mate 20 Pro Oct 22 Frederic Paulussen Share the post "How to make RAW photos with the Huawei Mate 20 Pro" With new devices come new features. And also new settings. In this blog post, I like to run you through the camera-app of the Huawei Mate 20 Pro to make sure you can photograph in RAW too. Still thinking about buying a Huawei Mate 20 Pro? Read my full review here . Do all three Mate 20 Pro lenses support RAW? The simple and short answer is yes. The longer answer is yes but in different resolutions. The main lens supports 40 megapixels, the telephoto supports 8 megapixels and the ultra-wide supports 20 megapixels. The file-sizes and resolutions are all dependant on which sensor you shoot with. Of course, the 40 megapixels lens will crea...
Read more